A8-4500M vs Opteron 6276
Aggregated performance score
Opteron 6276 outperforms A8-4500M by 274% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 6276 and A8-4500M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1322 | 2289 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.26 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD A-Series |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (12 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | no data |
| Current price | $316 (2.7x MSRP) | $179 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6276 and A8-4500M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 316 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6276 and A8-4500M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | FS1r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and A8-4500M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and A8-4500M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and A8-4500M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | unknown |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7640G |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and A8-4500M.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Opteron 6276 outperforms A8-4500M by 274% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Opteron 6276 outperforms A8-4500M by 272% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Opteron 6276 outperforms A8-4500M by 24% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Opteron 6276 outperforms A8-4500M by 285% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.04 | 1.08 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 15 May 2012 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 35 Watt |
The Opteron 6276 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-4500M in performance tests.
Be aware that Opteron 6276 is a server/workstation processor while A8-4500M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and A8-4500M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
