EPYC 4564P vs Opteron 4310 EE
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 4310 EE and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 72 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 53.48 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 21.75 |
| Architecture codename | Seoul (2012) | Raphael (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 4 December 2012 (11 years ago) | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $415 | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 4310 EE and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 13,140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 4310 EE and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | C32 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 4310 EE and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 4310 EE and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 4310 EE and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 4310 EE and EPYC 4564P.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 December 2012 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 170 Watt |
Opteron 4310 EE has 385.7% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 4310 EE and EPYC 4564P. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 4310 EE and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
