Xeon 6780E vs Opteron 3380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 3380
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
2.48
Xeon 6780E
2024
144 cores / 144 threads, 330 Watt
49.45
+1894%

Xeon 6780E outperforms Opteron 3380 by a whopping 1894% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking191544
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.27
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.616.32
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameDelhi (2012−2013)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date4 December 2012 (12 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Opteron 3380 and Xeon 6780E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)144
Threads8144
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache384 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB4 MB (per module)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)108 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 3380 and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 3380 and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Opteron 3380 and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 3380 and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 3380 and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-6400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 3380 and Xeon 6780E.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data88

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Opteron 3380 2.48
Xeon 6780E 49.45
+1894%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Opteron 3380 4358
Samples: 5
Xeon 6780E 86734
+1890%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.48 49.45
Recency 4 December 2012 3 June 2024
Physical cores 8 144
Threads 8 144
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 330 Watt

Opteron 3380 has 407.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has a 1894% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 1700% more physical cores and 1700% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6780E is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 3380 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron  3380
Opteron 3380
Intel Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5 votes

Rate Opteron 3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 18 votes

Rate Xeon 6780E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 3380 and Xeon 6780E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.