Xeon w9-3595X vs 6780E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 6780E
2024
144 cores / 144 threads, 330 Watt
49.35
Xeon w9-3595X
2024
60 cores / 120 threads, 385 Watt
59.12
+19.8%

Xeon w9-3595X outperforms Xeon 6780E by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4525
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.287.59
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.326.49
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSierra Forest (2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2024 (1 year ago)24 August 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,350$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3595X has 493% better value for money than Xeon 6780E.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 6780E and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14460 (Hexaconta-Core)
Performance-coresno data60
Threads144120
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (per module)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache108 MB (shared)112.5 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °C81 °C
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 6780E and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4710FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6780E and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon 6780E and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX+-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6780E and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6780E and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6780E and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes88112

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 6780E 49.35
Xeon w9-3595X 59.12
+19.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 6780E 86734
Samples: 1
Xeon w9-3595X 103901
+19.8%
Samples: 16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.35 59.12
Recency 3 June 2024 24 August 2024
Physical cores 144 60
Threads 144 120
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 385 Watt

Xeon 6780E has 140% more physical cores and 20% more threads, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has a 19.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The Intel Xeon w9-3595X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6780E in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 18 votes

Rate Xeon 6780E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 76 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 6780E and Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.