EPYC 75F3 vs Opteron 3320 EE

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 3320 EE and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated42
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.41
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameDelhi (2012)Milan (2021)
Release date4 December 2012 (11 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,860
Current price$512 $8906 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 3320 EE and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size315 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 3320 EE and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+SP3
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 3320 EE and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 3320 EE and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 3320 EE and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 3320 EE and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 December 2012 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 280 Watt

We couldn't decide between Opteron 3320 EE and EPYC 75F3. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 3320 EE and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron  3320 EE
Opteron 3320 EE
AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 3320 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 3320 EE or EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.