Athlon MP 1900+ vs Opteron 250

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 250 and Athlon MP 1900+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3043not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon MP
Power efficiency0.44no data
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateDecember 2004 (20 years ago)12 December 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$12$319

Detailed specifications

Opteron 250 and Athlon MP 1900+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm180 nm
Die size193 mm2128 mm2
Number of transistors106 million38 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 250 and Athlon MP 1900+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
Socket940no data
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt66 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 250 and Athlon MP 1900+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 66 Watt

Opteron 250 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon MP 1900+, on the other hand, has 34.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 250 and Athlon MP 1900+. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 250
Opteron 250
AMD Athlon MP 1900+
Athlon MP 1900+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Opteron 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 250 and Athlon MP 1900+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.