Xeon Platinum 8570 vs Opteron 142
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8570 outperforms Opteron 142 by a whopping 22046% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3424 | 42 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.47 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.30 | 16.28 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| Release date | September 2003 (22 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $9,595 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 142 and Xeon Platinum 8570 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 112 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 300 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 142 and Xeon Platinum 8570 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 940 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 142 and Xeon Platinum 8570. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 142 and Xeon Platinum 8570 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 142 and Xeon Platinum 8570 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 142 and Xeon Platinum 8570. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 142 and Xeon Platinum 8570.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.24 | 53.15 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 56 |
| Threads | 1 | 112 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 350 Watt |
Opteron 142 has 311.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8570, on the other hand, has a 22045.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 5500% more physical cores and 11100% more threads.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8570 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 142 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
