Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Opteron 142
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 9 465 outperforms Opteron 142 by a whopping 8044% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3587 | 678 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.08 | 19.64 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Gorgon Point (2026) |
| Release date | September 2003 (22 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 142 and Ryzen AI 9 465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | no data |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 142 and Ryzen AI 9 465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 940 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 28 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 13.03 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 465 has a 8043.8% higher aggregate performance score, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and 203.6% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 142 in performance tests.
Be aware that Opteron 142 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 465 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
