Celeron N2840 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40

VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron SI-40
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.20
Celeron N2840
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.37
+85%

Celeron N2840 outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-40 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron N2840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32393040
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.765.00
Architecture codenameSable (2008−2009)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date4 July 2008 (16 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron N2840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus rate1800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g2FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125Vno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+

Security technologies

Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.32 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron N2840.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Sempron SI-40 0.20
Celeron N2840 0.37
+85%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Mobile Sempron SI-40 772
Celeron N2840 1510
+95.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 0.37
Recency 4 July 2008 22 May 2014
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron N2840 has a 85% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N2840 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-40 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron N2840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron SI-40
Mobile Sempron SI-40
Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 35 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 660 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron SI-40 or Celeron N2840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.