Celeron M 925 vs Mobile Sempron M100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3201not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency0.83no data
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$70

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
Chip lithography40 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsAMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMXno data
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2009 1 January 2011
Chip lithography 40 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Mobile Sempron M100 has a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

Celeron M 925, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron M 925. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron M100
Mobile Sempron M100
Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron M100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron M100 or Celeron M 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.