Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Mobile Sempron M100
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3488 | 3297 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (16 years ago) | 1 February 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S | Socket P 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 1 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Security technologies
Mobile Sempron M100 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 0.36 |
| Recency | 10 September 2009 | 1 February 2010 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 1 Watt |
Mobile Sempron M100 has a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron Dual-Core T3300, on the other hand, has a 80% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 51100% lower power consumption.
The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
