Atom N270 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron 3300+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.18
+125%
Atom N270
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.08

Mobile Sempron 3300+ outperforms Atom N270 by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34293567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.283.09
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameRoma (2005)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date1 June 2005 (20 years ago)2 April 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$44

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cacheno data56 KB
L2 cache128 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data25.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket745PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)62/25 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bitIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Mobile Sempron 3300+ 0.18
+125%
Atom N270 0.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Mobile Sempron 3300+ 294
+116%
Atom N270 136

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Mobile Sempron 3300+ 84
+50%
Atom N270 126

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 0.08
Recency 1 June 2005 2 April 2008
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 2 Watt

Mobile Sempron 3300+ has a 125% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 3000% lower power consumption.

The AMD Mobile Sempron 3300+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N270 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 3300+
Mobile Sempron 3300+
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Sempron 3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 259 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom N270, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.