Atom E3826 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+

Place in the ranking	3243	3234
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Mobile Sempron	Atom
Power efficiency	0.29	2.57
Architecture codename	Roma (2005)	Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date	1 June 2005 (19 years ago)	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom E3826 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Boost clock speed	2 GHz	1.47 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	128 KB	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	no data	0 KB
Chip lithography	90 nm	22 nm
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom E3826 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	745	Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)	62/25 Watt	7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom E3826. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom E3826. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel HD Graphics

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Sempron 3300+ 0.19

Atom E3826 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Sempron 3300+ 294

Atom E3826 304
+3.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Recency	1 June 2005	8 October 2013
Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	90 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt	7 Watt

Atom E3826 has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 785.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom E3826.

Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Atom E3826, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.