Apple M1 Max vs Mobile Sempron 3300+
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 621 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Roma (2005) | no data |
| Release date | 1 June 2005 (19 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | $15 | $8.99 |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | 745 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62/25 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Apple M1 Max outperforms Mobile Sempron 3300+ by 7397% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2005 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
