Athlon Gold 3150U vs Athlon Neo MV-40

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon Gold 3150U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1739
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon NeoAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data15.87
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon Gold 3150U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache128 KB192 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon Gold 3150U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketASB1FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon Gold 3150U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon Gold 3150U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon Gold 3150U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon Gold 3150U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo MV-40 275
Athlon Gold 3150U 3988
+1350%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon Neo MV-40 1274
Athlon Gold 3150U 3639
+186%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon Neo MV-40 1149
Athlon Gold 3150U 7566
+559%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon Neo MV-40 614
Athlon Gold 3150U 4189
+582%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon Neo MV-40 102
Athlon Gold 3150U 40.13
+154%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0
Athlon Gold 3150U 4
+1109%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0.1
Athlon Gold 3150U 2.2
+3567%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Athlon Neo MV-40 2
Athlon Gold 3150U 22
+1046%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Athlon Neo MV-40 12
Athlon Gold 3150U 107
+819%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Athlon Neo MV-40 332
Athlon Gold 3150U 1631
+391%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2009 6 January 2020
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm

Athlon Gold 3150U has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon Gold 3150U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon Gold 3150U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
Athlon Gold 3150U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 901 vote

Rate Athlon Gold 3150U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or Athlon Gold 3150U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.