3015e vs Mobile Sempron 3300+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron 3300+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.19
3015e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.71
+800%

3015e outperforms Mobile Sempron 3300+ by a whopping 800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 3300+ and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32432043
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency0.2926.97
Architecture codenameRoma (2005)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date1 June 2005 (19 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3300+ and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache128 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3300+ and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket745FT5
Power consumption (TDP)62/25 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Sempron 3300+ 0.19
3015e 1.71
+800%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Sempron 3300+ 294
3015e 2709
+821%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 1.71
Recency 1 June 2005 4 August 2020
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 6 Watt

3015e has a 800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 933.3% lower power consumption.

The 3015e is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron 3300+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 3300+
Mobile Sempron 3300+
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Sempron 3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 3300+ or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.