Pentium M 1.60 vs Mobile Sempron 3200+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 3200+ and Pentium M 1.60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Sempronno data
Architecture codenameKeeneBanias (2003)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3200+ and Pentium M 1.60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data16 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data130 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Number of transistorsno data77 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3200+ and Pentium M 1.60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data478
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt24 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3200+ and Pentium M 1.60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Sempron 3200+ 245
+26.3%
Pentium M 1.60 194

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 24 Watt

Pentium M 1.60 has 4.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 3200+ and Pentium M 1.60. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3200+ and Pentium M 1.60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 3200+
Mobile Sempron 3200+
Intel Pentium M 1.60
Pentium M 1.60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Mobile Sempron 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 10 votes

Rate Pentium M 1.60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 3200+ or Pentium M 1.60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.