Celeron E1400 vs Mobile Pentium 4 532
Aggregate performance score
Celeron E1400 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 532 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3304 | 3047 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Mobile Pentium 4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.25 | 0.68 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Allendale (2006−2009) |
| Release date | no data | April 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $57 |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron E1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.06 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 77 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 73 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 105 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron E1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron E1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron E1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron E1400 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron E1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.23 | 0.46 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron E1400 has a 100% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 35.4% lower power consumption.
The Intel Celeron E1400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Mobile Pentium 4 532 in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobile Pentium 4 532 is a notebook processor while Celeron E1400 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
