Celeron T3500 vs Turion II M520

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II M520
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.56
+19.1%

Turion II M520 outperforms Celeron T3500 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29733050
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion IIno data
Power efficiency1.531.29
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)no data
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II M520 and Celeron T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II M520 and Celeron T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M520 and Celeron T3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.47
Recency 10 September 2009 1 July 2010

Turion II M520 has a 19.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron T3500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months.

The AMD Turion II M520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron T3500 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II M520
Turion II M520
Intel Celeron T3500
Celeron T3500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 92 votes

Rate Turion II M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 8 votes

Rate Celeron T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion II M520 and Celeron T3500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.