Xeon Gold 5512U vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
2003
1 core / 2 threads, 68 Watt
0.13
Xeon Gold 5512U
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 185 Watt
38.00
+29131%

Xeon Gold 5512U outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 by a whopping 29131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 and Xeon Gold 5512U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking333180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data97.62
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency0.1819.44
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release dateJune 2003 (21 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,230

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 and Xeon Gold 5512U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache8 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB52.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size131 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C89 °C
Number of transistors55 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 and Xeon Gold 5512U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket478FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 and Xeon Gold 5512U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 and Xeon Gold 5512U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 and Xeon Gold 5512U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 and Xeon Gold 5512U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 and Xeon Gold 5512U.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 0.13
Xeon Gold 5512U 38.00
+29131%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 205
Xeon Gold 5512U 60365
+29346%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 38.00
Physical cores 1 28
Threads 2 56
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 185 Watt

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 has 172.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5512U, on the other hand, has a 29130.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 2700% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 5512U is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5512U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 and Xeon Gold 5512U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Intel Xeon Gold 5512U
Xeon Gold 5512U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 8 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5512U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 or Xeon Gold 5512U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.