Core 2 Solo U2200 vs Mobile Athlon 64 4000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.20
Core 2 Solo U2200
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.20

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core 2 Solo U2200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32403241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64Core 2 Solo
Power efficiency0.313.44
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)Merom-L (2007)
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core 2 Solo U2200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.8V-1V

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core 2 Solo U2200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core 2 Solo U2200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core 2 Solo U2200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core 2 Solo U2200 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 0.20
Core 2 Solo U2200 0.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 313
+0.6%
Core 2 Solo U2200 311

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 5 Watt

Core 2 Solo U2200 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1140% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core 2 Solo U2200.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core 2 Solo U2200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
Intel Core 2 Solo U2200
Core 2 Solo U2200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Solo U2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ or Core 2 Solo U2200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.