E-350 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Athlon 64 | AMD E-Series |
| Architecture codename | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
| Release date | August 2005 (18 years ago) | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Current price | $30 | $268 |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 40 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 754 | FT1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | DDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and E-350 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
E-350 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ by 26% in Passmark.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ outperforms E-350 by 23% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 18 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and E-350. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
