Xeon E-2436 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data98.37
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiencyno data20.62
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$331

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz16 GT/s
L1 cache128K80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data18 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno dataIntel 7 nm
Die size193 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ 326
Xeon E-2436 22487
+6798%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 65 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ has 4.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2436, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon E-2436. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2436 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.