EPYC 7401 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7401 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ by a whopping 12416% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3417 | 164 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.22 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Mobile Athlon 64 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 19.78 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Oakville (2003−2004) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| Release date | August 2003 (22 years ago) | 29 June 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,850 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and EPYC 7401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 20 |
| L1 cache | 128K | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 14 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and EPYC 7401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | 754 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and EPYC 7401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and EPYC 7401 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and EPYC 7401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 170.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and EPYC 7401.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 31.29 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 170 Watt |
EPYC 7401 has a 12416% higher aggregate performance score, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and 201.2% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7401 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is a notebook processor while EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
