Duo LV L2500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Duo LV L2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)September 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Duo LV L2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K0 KB
L2 cache512K2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data65 nm
Die size193 mm290 mm2
Number of transistors106 million151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Duo LV L2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754479
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Duo LV L2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR1

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Duo LV L2500 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Duo LV L2500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Duo LV L2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Intel Core Duo LV L2500
Core Duo LV L2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Duo LV L2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ or Core Duo LV L2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.