A4-5300B vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Aggregate performance score
A4-5300B outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3447 | 2949 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Mobile Athlon 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.30 | 0.46 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Oakville (2003−2004) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | August 2004 (21 years ago) | 2 October 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and A4-5300B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 32 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and A4-5300B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 754 | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and A4-5300B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and A4-5300B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7480D |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 0.71 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ has 85.7% lower power consumption.
A4-5300B, on the other hand, has a 184% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The AMD A4-5300B is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is a notebook processor while A4-5300B is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
