Ultra 7 265KF vs M3-8100Y

VS

Primary details

Comparing M3-8100Y and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated88
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data98.08
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core M3no data
Power efficiencyno data28.13
Architecture codenameAmber Lake (2018−2019)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date28 August 2018 (6 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M3-8100Y and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on M3-8100Y and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno data1851
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3-8100Y and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

M3-8100Y and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3-8100Y and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3-8100Y and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 615N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3-8100Y and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1020

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 August 2018 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 125 Watt

M3-8100Y has 2400% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between M3-8100Y and Core Ultra 7 265KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that M3-8100Y is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between M3-8100Y and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel M3-8100Y
M3-8100Y
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate M3-8100Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 38 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M3-8100Y or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.