Athlon MP 1000 vs M3-8100Y
Primary details
Comparing M3-8100Y and Athlon MP 1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core M3 | AMD Athlon MP |
| Architecture codename | Amber Lake (2018−2019) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 28 August 2018 (6 years ago) | 5 June 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | $215 |
Detailed specifications
M3-8100Y and Athlon MP 1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus type | OPI | FSB |
| Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 16 | 7.5 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 128 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 38 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on M3-8100Y and Athlon MP 1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 46.1 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3-8100Y and Athlon MP 1000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3-8100Y and Athlon MP 1000 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3-8100Y and Athlon MP 1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.861 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3-8100Y and Athlon MP 1000.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 10 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 28 August 2018 | 5 June 2001 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 46 Watt |
M3-8100Y has an age advantage of 17 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 820% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between M3-8100Y and Athlon MP 1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that M3-8100Y is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 1000 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between M3-8100Y and Athlon MP 1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
