Atom x7203C vs Itanium 9320
Primary details
Comparing Itanium 9320 and Atom x7203C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | no data | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $42 |
Detailed specifications
Itanium 9320 and Atom x7203C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.47 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Itanium 9320 and Atom x7203C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1248 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9320 and Atom x7203C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 50 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Itanium 9320 and Atom x7203C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9320 and Atom x7203C are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9320 and Atom x7203C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Itanium 9320 and Atom x7203C.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2010 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 9 Watt |
Itanium 9320 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Atom x7203C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 1622.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Itanium 9320 and Atom x7203C. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Itanium 9320 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7203C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Itanium 9320 and Atom x7203C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
