Ryzen 5 4680U vs Itanium 9310
Primary details
Comparing Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 5 4680U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 918 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 51.49 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 13 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 5 4680U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 10 MB L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 5 4680U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FCLGA1248 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 5 4680U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 50 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 5 4680U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 5 4680U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 5 4680U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 68.27 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 7 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2010 | 13 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 4680U has an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 5 4680U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Itanium 9310 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 4680U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 5 4680U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
