Xeon Platinum 8593Q vs Iris Graphics 48

VS

Primary details

Comparing Iris Graphics 48 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Iris Graphicsno data
Architecture codenameGen9Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12,400

Detailed specifications

Iris Graphics 48 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threadsno data128
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.3 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data60 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Iris Graphics 48 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)no data385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Iris Graphics 48 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory size65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 48 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 48 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8593Q is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Iris Graphics 48 and Xeon Platinum 8593Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48
Intel Xeon Platinum 8593Q
Xeon Platinum 8593Q

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 5 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 14 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8593Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Iris Graphics 48 or Xeon Platinum 8593Q, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.