Ryzen 7 7735U vs Iris Graphics 48

VS

Primary details

Comparing Iris Graphics 48 and Ryzen 7 7735U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated552
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Iris Graphicsno data
Power efficiencyno data45.07
Architecture codenameGen9Rembrandt-U Refresh (2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Iris Graphics 48 and Ryzen 7 7735U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data16
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed0.3 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Iris Graphics 48 and Ryzen 7 7735U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP7
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Ryzen 7 7735U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Ryzen 7 7735U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Ryzen 7 7735U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Ryzen 7 7735U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm

Ryzen 7 7735U has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 48 and Ryzen 7 7735U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Iris Graphics 48 and Ryzen 7 7735U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
Ryzen 7 7735U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 5 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 101 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 7735U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Iris Graphics 48 or Ryzen 7 7735U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.