Celeron G6900T vs Iris Graphics 48

VS

Primary details

Comparing Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1740
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Iris Graphicsno data
Power efficiencyno data6.81
Architecture codenameGen9Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed0.3 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 48 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48
Intel Celeron G6900T
Celeron G6900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 5 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 676 votes

Rate Celeron G6900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Iris Graphics 48 or Celeron G6900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.