Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs HD Graphics 530
Primary details
Comparing HD Graphics 530 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 84 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 100.00 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel HD Graphics | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gen9 | no data |
| Release date | no data | 1 January 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Current price | $614 | $44 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
HD Graphics 530 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 15 (Pentadeca-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 30 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.35 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 cache | no data | 37.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 67 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on HD Graphics 530 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by HD Graphics 530 and Xeon E7-8895 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 46 Bit |
| Instruction Replay | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
HD Graphics 530 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by HD Graphics 530 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by HD Graphics 530 and Xeon E7-8895 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB | 1.5 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by HD Graphics 530 and Xeon E7-8895 v2.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 530 and Xeon E7-8895 v2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that HD Graphics 530 is a notebook processor while Xeon E7-8895 v2 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between HD Graphics 530 and Xeon E7-8895 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
