Celeron 837 vs Geode LX 800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Geode LX 800 and Celeron 837 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesGeode LXIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameCastleSandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateno datano data
Current price$300 $23

Detailed specifications

Geode LX 800 and Celeron 837 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed0.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Number of transistorsno data504 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Geode LX 800 and Celeron 837 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)3.6 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Geode LX 800 and Celeron 837. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMAno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Geode LX 800 and Celeron 837 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Geode LX 800 and Celeron 837. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 17 Watt

We couldn't decide between Geode LX 800 and Celeron 837. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Geode LX 800 and Celeron 837, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Geode LX 800
Geode LX 800
Intel Celeron 837
Celeron 837

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Geode LX 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 837 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Geode LX 800 or Celeron 837, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.