Ryzen 7 3700X vs GX-210JA

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GX-210JA
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.16
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.19
+8769%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms GX-210JA by a whopping 8769% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 3700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3293508
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.46
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMDAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency2.5220.66
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 3700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB512 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data32 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Number of transistorsno data19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 3700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT3 BGAAM4
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 3700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 3700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 3700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GX-210JA 0.16
Ryzen 7 3700X 14.19
+8769%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

GX-210JA 248
Ryzen 7 3700X 22535
+8987%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 14.19
Recency 23 May 2013 27 May 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

GX-210JA has 983.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 3700X, on the other hand, has a 8768.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 3700X is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.

Be aware that GX-210JA is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 3700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 3700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5360 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GX-210JA or Ryzen 7 3700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.