Xeon E3110 vs FX-9590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
6.59
+724%

FX-9590 outperforms Xeon E3110 by a whopping 724% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and Xeon E3110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10152563
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and Xeon E3110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed4.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5 GHzno data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and Xeon E3110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and Xeon E3110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and Xeon E3110 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and Xeon E3110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and Xeon E3110.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9590 6.59
+724%
Xeon E3110 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9590 10194
+721%
Xeon E3110 1242

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-9590 546
+40.7%
Xeon E3110 388

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-9590 2170
+235%
Xeon E3110 648

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.59 0.80
Recency 6 July 2013 1 January 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 65 Watt

FX-9590 has a 723.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

Xeon E3110, on the other hand, has 238.5% lower power consumption.

The FX-9590 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3110 in performance tests.

Note that FX-9590 is a desktop processor while Xeon E3110 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and Xeon E3110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
Intel Xeon E3110
Xeon E3110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 901 vote

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 38 votes

Rate Xeon E3110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or Xeon E3110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.