A10-4657M vs FX-9590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
6.59
+478%

FX-9590 outperforms A10-4657M by a whopping 478% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and A10-4657M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9772293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.79no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date6 July 2013 (10 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price$321 $83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed4.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.2 GHz
L2 cache8192 KB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million1303 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+BGA
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and A10-4657M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and A10-4657M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7660G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and A10-4657M.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9590 6.59
+478%
A10-4657M 1.14

FX-9590 outperforms A10-4657M by 478% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-9590 10194
+480%
A10-4657M 1759

FX-9590 outperforms A10-4657M by 480% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.59 1.14
Recency 6 July 2013 1 April 2013
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 35 Watt

The FX-9590 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4657M in performance tests.

Note that FX-9590 is a desktop processor while A10-4657M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and A10-4657M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
AMD A10-4657M
A10-4657M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 896 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A10-4657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or A10-4657M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.