Pentium 4 560 vs FX-9370

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9370
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
3.92
+1767%
Pentium 4 560
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 88 Watt
0.21

FX-9370 outperforms Pentium 4 560 by a whopping 1767% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9370 and Pentium 4 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14443218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataPentium 4
Power efficiency1.700.23
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9370 and Pentium 4 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed4.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data16 KB
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9370 and Pentium 4 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+775
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt88 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and Pentium 4 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and Pentium 4 560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and Pentium 4 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and Pentium 4 560.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.92 0.21
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 88 Watt

FX-9370 has a 1766.7% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 4 560, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The FX-9370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9370 and Pentium 4 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9370
FX-9370
Intel Pentium 4 560
Pentium 4 560

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 165 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 17 votes

Rate Pentium 4 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9370 or Pentium 4 560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.