Atom C3850 vs FX-9370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-9370 and Atom C3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1360not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.23no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date6 July 2013 (10 years ago)15 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$323
Current price$162 $850 (2.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9370 and Atom C3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed4.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data672 KB
L2 cache8192 KB12 MB
L3 cacheno data12 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature57 °C78 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9370 and Atom C3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and Atom C3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

FX-9370 and Atom C3850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and Atom C3850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and Atom C3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and Atom C3850.

PCIe versionn/a3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data2x10/2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 July 2013 15 August 2017
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 25 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-9370 and Atom C3850. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-9370 is a desktop processor while Atom C3850 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9370 and Atom C3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9370
FX-9370
Intel Atom C3850
Atom C3850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 152 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9370 or Atom C3850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.