Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-8800P

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-8800P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
1.84
Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads
11.49
+524%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms FX-8800P by 524% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing FX-8800P and Ryzen 5 3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1884613
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data41.14
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date3 June 2015 (8 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199
Current price$515 $148 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

FX-8800P and Ryzen 5 3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on FX-8800P and Ryzen 5 3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8800P and Ryzen 5 3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4no data
AVXAVX+
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8800P and Ryzen 5 3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8800P and Ryzen 5 3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphics-
iGPU core count8-
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics1-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8800P and Ryzen 5 3600 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8800P and Ryzen 5 3600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12-
Vulkan1-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8800P and Ryzen 5 3600.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8800P 1.84
Ryzen 5 3600 11.49
+524%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms FX-8800P by 524% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8800P 2851
Ryzen 5 3600 17766
+523%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms FX-8800P by 523% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8800P 522
Ryzen 5 3600 1598
+206%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms FX-8800P by 206% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8800P 1190
Ryzen 5 3600 6882
+478%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms FX-8800P by 478% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-8800P 277
Ryzen 5 3600 1568
+466%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms FX-8800P by 466% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-8800P 82
Ryzen 5 3600 192
+134%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms FX-8800P by 134% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.84 11.49
Recency 3 June 2015 7 July 2019
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8800P in performance tests.

Be aware that FX-8800P is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8800P and Ryzen 5 3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8800P
FX-8800P
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 94 votes

Rate FX-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 15407 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8800P or Ryzen 5 3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.