Core i7-13700HX vs FX-8370
Aggregate performance score
i7-13700HX outperforms FX-8370 by a whopping 447% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing FX-8370 and Core i7-13700HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1400 | 236 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Raptor Lake-HX |
Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) |
Release date | 2 September 2014 (9 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-8370 and Core i7-13700HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 24 |
Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 24 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 30 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 315 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8370 and Core i7-13700HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM3+ | BGA1964 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and Core i7-13700HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
FX-8370 and Core i7-13700HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and Core i7-13700HX are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and Core i7-13700HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and Core i7-13700HX.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 3.99 | 21.84 |
Recency | 2 September 2014 | 4 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
Threads | 8 | 24 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 55 Watt |
i7-13700HX has a 447.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-13700HX is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8370 in performance tests.
Note that FX-8370 is a desktop processor while Core i7-13700HX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and Core i7-13700HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.