Turion 64 X2 TL-64 vs FX-8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1390not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)2x AMD Turion 64
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Trinidad (2006−2007)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)13 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Current price$162 $56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2147 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million154 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+S1
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.165 nm, 1.075
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8350 5936
+758%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 692

FX-8350 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-64 by 758% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

FX-8350 3201
+85.5%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1726

FX-8350 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-64 by 85% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-8350 16904
+428%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 3201

FX-8350 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-64 by 428% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-8350 6648
+338%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1518

FX-8350 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-64 by 338% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 13 April 2007
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-8350 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8350 is a desktop processor while Turion 64 X2 TL-64 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and Turion 64 X2 TL-64, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Turion 64 X2 TL-64

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3437 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or Turion 64 X2 TL-64, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.