Phenom II X2 B57 vs FX-8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.84
+374%

FX-8350 outperforms Phenom II X2 B57 by a whopping 374% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and Phenom II X2 B57 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13902508
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.111.83
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Callisto (2009−2010)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)11 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$162 $40

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom II X2 B57 has 65% better value for money than FX-8350.

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and Phenom II X2 B57 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2258 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and Phenom II X2 B57 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Phenom II X2 B57. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1no data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Phenom II X2 B57 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Phenom II X2 B57. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Phenom II X2 B57.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8350 3.84
+374%
Phenom II X2 B57 0.81

FX-8350 outperforms Phenom II X2 B57 by 374% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8350 5936
+376%
Phenom II X2 B57 1247

FX-8350 outperforms Phenom II X2 B57 by 376% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.84 0.81
Recency 23 October 2012 11 May 2010
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 80 Watt

The FX-8350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X2 B57 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and Phenom II X2 B57, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
AMD Phenom II X2 B57
Phenom II X2 B57

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3432 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 12 votes

Rate Phenom II X2 B57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or Phenom II X2 B57, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.