Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs FX-8320

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.53
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
24 cores / 48 threads, 350 Watt
53.87
+1426%

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X outperforms FX-8320 by a whopping 1426% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking145923
Place by popularitynot in top-1007
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.44no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Storm Peak
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)no data
Current price$106 $1397

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size315 mm24x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X.

PCIe versionn/a5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320 3.53
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 53.87
+1426%

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X outperforms FX-8320 by 1426% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8320 5455
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 83320
+1427%

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X outperforms FX-8320 by 1427% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.53 53.87
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 350 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1297 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 31 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 7960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Ryzen Threadripper 7960X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.