Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs FX-8320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.43
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
12.87
+275%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms FX-8320 by a whopping 275% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1549587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency2.6018.74
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplierno data36
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size315 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.

PCIe versionn/a4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320 3.43
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G 12.87
+275%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8320 5443
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G 20448
+276%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8320 460
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G 1636
+256%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8320 1808
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G 7616
+321%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.43 12.87
Recency 23 October 2012 21 July 2020
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G has a 275.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1389 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 435 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.