Processor U300E vs FX-8320
Primary details
Comparing FX-8320 and Processor U300E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1545 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 2.60 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-8320 and Processor U300E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8320 and Processor U300E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Processor U300E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
FX-8320 and Processor U300E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Processor U300E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Processor U300E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 48EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Processor U300E.
| PCIe version | n/a | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 5 |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
FX-8320 has 60% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Processor U300E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-8320 and Processor U300E. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Processor U300E is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Processor U300E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
