Turion 64 MT-30 vs FX-8300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8300 and Turion 64 MT-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1480not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.45no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataTurion 64
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)March 2005 (19 years ago)
Current price$90 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8300 and Turion 64 MT-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8300 and Turion 64 MT-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+754
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8300 and Turion 64 MT-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
PowerNowno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8300 and Turion 64 MT-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8300 and Turion 64 MT-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8300 and Turion 64 MT-30.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-8300 and Turion 64 MT-30. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8300 is a desktop processor while Turion 64 MT-30 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8300 and Turion 64 MT-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8300
FX-8300
AMD Turion 64 MT-30
Turion 64 MT-30

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2233 votes

Rate FX-8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 MT-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8300 or Turion 64 MT-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.