A4-9120C vs FX-770K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-770K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.88
+255%

FX-770K outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-770K and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18942752
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateDecember 2014 (9 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$28 $290

Detailed specifications

FX-770K and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache256K160 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-770K and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-770K and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-770K and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-770K and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-770K and A4-9120C.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-770K 1.88
+255%
A4-9120C 0.53

FX-770K outperforms A4-9120C by 255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-770K 2915
+257%
A4-9120C 817

FX-770K outperforms A4-9120C by 257% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.88 0.53
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

The FX-770K is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.

Note that FX-770K is a desktop processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-770K and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-770K
FX-770K
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 74 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-770K or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.