Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs FX-7600P

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7600P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.63
+308%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40

FX-7600P outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by a whopping 308% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-7600P and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20943003
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency4.401.08
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-7600P and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.87 GHz
Bus rateBGA (FP3)533 MHz
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-7600P and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7600P and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7600P and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7600P and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7600P and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7600P and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7600P and Celeron Dual-Core T1500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-7600P 1.63
+308%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 0.40

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

FX-7600P 2555
+57.2%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 1625

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

FX-7600P 7418
+151%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 2960

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

FX-7600P 3569
+155%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 1400

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 0.40
Recency 4 June 2014 1 May 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

FX-7600P has a 307.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-7600P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7600P and Celeron Dual-Core T1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7600P
FX-7600P
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 11 votes

Rate FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7600P or Celeron Dual-Core T1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.